One advantage of IWB holsters: they do not require a very sturdy belt.
- Send email to Oleg Volk.
-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
Archives
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
Categories
- advice requested
- ammunition
- art
- author
- beast
- book
- camera and lens
- civil rights
- computing
- craft
- dangerous
- flowers
- food
- green
- holster
- hoster
- humor
- hunting
- interesting people
- knife
- light/laser
- nature
- nude
- pet
- pink
- pistol
- prey
- red
- rifle
- rkba
- self-defense
- shotgun
- sound suppressor
- tools
- training
- Uncategorized
- weapon
- wordpress
Meta


IWB holsters may not need a sturdy belt, but I find that it’s generally more comfortable with one.
I’m with Dan on this one, a good belt makes a big difference with any belt-mounted holster, although the featherweight pf9 is pretty forgiving as far as “needing” a good gunbelt.
I’ll third that. Of course a Glock 30 and spare magazine make a difference.
But then I do have one advantage over the lady pictured. There’s considerably more room available on my belt.
They may not require it, but they are much improved by a good, sturdy belt